Date-stamped : 03 May97 - 06:14 Derbyshire lose count By Neil Hallam at Derby Yorks (260-5) bt Derbyshire (260-7) on countback JUST when we thought the arcane regulations of limited overs cricket could not produce new complications to perplex the spectator, along came another bizarre twist to send large numbers of them home unsure who had won or exactly how. Some, indeed, turned back from the exits to seek enlightenment after an eventful and, to many, mystifying final over from Chris Silverwood had left Derbyshire`s score level with Yorkshire`s at 260 for seven. "For those of you who are not familiar with the rules of this competition," the public address man eventually offered: "Yorkshire have won on a countback to the 25 overs stage, at which they had scored 116 and Derbyshire had 103." Bafflement had set in with what should have been the final delivery of a last over which began with Derbyshire needing 11 to win - a prospect which receded when Silverwood summoned a fine yorker to dislodge the resourceful Karl Krikken with his second ball. Six were needed off his sixth ball and though Phil DeFreitas chipped it past him for only two, a "no ball" shout from umpire David Constant meant that Derbyshire`s hopes were very much alive again. Silverwood, striving for a full length, served up a full-toss above waist height which Constant ruled a beamer, to give Derbyshire a two-run bonus and - after a five-minute delay for the consequences to be discussed - another ball from which to go for their third victory out of three. DeFreitas managed to squeeze only a single out of another ball fired into the blockhole, so it was Yorkshire who triumphed in a game Derbyshire seemed well placed to win at 175 for two after 38 overs. The wicket of Kim Barnett, held at long-on after making 88 came off 130 balls, began a middle-order wobble and earned left-arm spinner Richard Stemp the Gold Award, for which Barnett, Peter Hartley, Silverwood and DeFreitas were also contenders. Yorkshire, who chose to bat first on a wicket of occasionally low bounce, also failed to capitalise on a prosperous start, subsiding from 175 for two in 38 overs as Barnett`s gentle medium pace induced a sequence of crude lunges when sensible placement was required. Source :: The Electronic Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/) Contributed by The Management (help@cricinfo.com)